The study of knowledge traditionally studies of the problem ‘to know’. This has been changed in more recent times, significantly by the work of Karl Popper who argued that knowledge was independent of the question of knowing, so the existence of knowledge did not depend on the existence of a knowing person.
The position here follows Popper and can be summarised as follows. There is a Reality beyond our senses, which contribute to our knowledge, and we can know that knowledge. There are three relationships: first between knowledge and Reality, second between Reality and our knowing, and third between knowing and ourselves.
The three relationships deal with three related but different issues. The first is how we come to know Reality, this is the problem of perception as it arises in this philosophy and is the topic of the first paper. Questions on our relationship with what we know are questions of psychology.
There remains within the example the question of how we know at all. That is what happens when we have a thought. But this is not epistemology rather it is the mechanisms of epistemology, the workings of the brain.
Strictly following Popper, epistemology is exploring the relationship between our knowledge of Reality and that Reality. It takes us into some very detailed, technical questions of the type already alluded to, questions such as those below.
– What exactly is the relationship between knowledge and Reality?
– In what way is there a Reality?
– How does Reality influence formation of our knowledge of it?
– If knowledge is an abstraction from Reality, then what is an abstraction?
– If knowledge of Reality exists independent of Reality, then in what manner does that knowledge exist (the ontological question)?
– If knowledge exists, then in line with all other objects it must have a structure. What is the structure of knowledge? Can we create a theory that describes the structure of knowledge itself?
– If we answer all these questions where on earth will it take us? (The question of wonder.)